|
LOWER RIO
GRANDE WATER RIGHTS DECLARATION
The adjudication of water rights in the Lower Rio
Grande has been in the courts now for many years. During all of
that time, the State Engineer has been dickering with the United States
and the Elephant Butte Irrigation District over how much water they both
should own. These negotiations pre-suppose that the State Engineer
has any standing or authority to negotiate anything and that the United States, the
Elephant Butte Irrigation District and the farmers within the boundaries
of the EBID have any water rights at all. In fact evidence
presented to the LRG adjudication court as an
Amicus Curiae
Brief shows that farmers whose land is upland on the mesas have no rights and neither the State Engineer nor the EBID have any standing under the doctrine of
Privity to negotiate
anything. Water rights can not be gained through adverse
possession, a position upheld by the State Engineer in their amicus
curiae brief in Turner v. Bassett. Consequently, the
State Engineer is judicially estopped from changing their tune
Be this as it may, the U.S., EBID, and the State
Engineer are in a steadfast conspiracy to designate all water rights
within the LRG as having a priority date of January 25, 1906.
January 25, 1906 is the date that alleged Application No. 8 was
allegedly filed for the Rio Grande Project. Problem is that what
is called Application No. 8 is a nul tiel record. It
doesn't exist. It is unsigned and bears no attribution to being
submitted by the U.S. Reclamation Service to the Territorial Engineer as
would be required by Section 8 of the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902. Additionally it is grossly
deficient and incomplete in every regard. The document bears the
name of B.M. Hall as though perhaps he submitted it but it is not in
B.M. Hall's handwriting. It is likely the attempt by a secretary
in the Office of the Territorial Engineer to fill out an application
based on the January 23, 1906 letter from B.M. Hall reserving 2,000,000
acre feet of storage in the U.S.R.S. Elephant Butte Reservoir and
730,000 acre feet per year. Therefore, it was not filled out by
the U.S.R.S and it no application at all.
So, the January 25, 1906 date is a bogus date and we
know from the surveys of Follett (1896) and Yeo (1910), from the
reports of Homer Gault and the writings of Arthur Powell Davis, all U.S.R.S. employees
in the 1890 to 1916 period, that about 30,000 acres
of bottom land were irrigated with the normal flow of the Rio Grande and that
they have pre-1900 priority dates.
In 2007, WaterBank®
revealed for the first time, the
existence of maps of irrigated areas prepared by James French, a U.S.R.S. surveyor, in 1903 that show the irrigated acreage at that time.
The French maps show about 31,000 acres of irrigated land. What is
particularly troubling is that WaterBank®
found the French maps buried in
the files of the State Engineer and that the State Engineer had been
hiding the ball from Judge Valentine for God knows how many years.
Through the efforts of WaterBank®
at public
conferences at which Judge Valentine was present, he became aware of the
French Maps. In 2007, Judge Valentine wrote to all parties in the
LRG adjudication advising them that they may have pre-1907 water rights
and telling them to file Declarations so that their earlier priorities
could be protected in the adjudication.
The State Engineer has remained intransigent and has
not recognized the earlier priority dates. Consequently,
WaterBank®
agreed to prepare a Declaration for a farmer in the LRG together with
all supporting information. The initial Declaration can be found by
clicking here.
Because most aerial photography was not included in the Declaration,
WaterBank®
prepared an Amended Declaration which can be accessed by clicking
here. If you feel your water rights need protection
or supporting documentation please call WaterBank®
at
505-843-7643.
Visitors since Septembers 22, 2009
Page hits :
|